In a 2010 article in the washington post by author stephen lowman, titled environmental impact of ebooks vs. One study highlighted that reading ebooks on the amazon kindle, for example, is only more green having read 23 books on the device. Is paper or pixels a more environmentally friendly way to read. There is no single answer as to which book is better from an environmental. Aug 24, 2010 think of an ereader as the cloth diaper of books. In a 2010 article in the washington post by author stephen lowman, titled environmental impact of e books vs. The site inspires people to plant a tree for every book they read, in an effort to offset the environmental impact of printing books. Are electronic books for ecofriendly than traditional. The environmental impact of growing numbers of ebooks in libraries. Aug 31, 2009 the new study finds that ereaders could have a major impact on improving the sustainability and environmental impact on the publishing industry, one of the worlds most polluting sectors, a statement at cleantechs web site states. Do you read the news more than 10 minutes each day. Apr 21, 2017 earth day is this saturday and many people will likely be reading a new ebook on their kindle to promote reduced emissions. If you upgrade more frequently, you need to be an even more avid reader to lower your environmental impact by switching to digital. Ebooks are better for the environment because they save on paper, however with paper books, you will not have to worry about your reader getting dropped, malfunctioning or breaking down as you would with an ebook.
Of course, there are advantages to reading digitally that go beyond any environmental impact assessment, like carrying an ereader instead of a bag full of books. With more resources at low enough levels to impact environmental stability and more habitats being. Political bookworm environmental impact of ebooks vs. Making an applestoapples comparison of the environmental impact of paper versus digital media is difficult.
In this research, the student book buying patterns are studied at a public engineering institution. Jan 24, 2014 if you upgrade more frequently, you need to be an even more avid reader to lower your environmental impact by switching to digital. There are also advantages to reading print that transcend any lifecycle analysis longevity, tactile feel of paper, and better reading comprehension. There is no single answer as to which book is better from an environmental perspective according to the results of the current study. Theres a lot of misinformation about paper and print versus ebooks. A paper book, magazine, or newspaper is a tangible item that you can pick up and hold while you are reading it. Despite the facts, you might be asking yourself, why should i care about the environmental impact of printed books vs ebooks. The production and use of paper has a number of adverse effects on the environment which are known collectively as paper pollution. Books are made from recyclable materials that require no mineral mining. An analysis by the cleantech group finds, when used to replace paper, amazons kindle is less. While it was necessary to have a variety of assumptions in order to perform this analysis, these same assumptions caused. Negative environmental impact are ebooks more green.
Readers choices and preferences across contexts article pdf available in journal of the american society for information science and technology 658 august. Ereaders in general are thought to be environmentally friendly, but. As the biggest industrial water user, the publishing industry is responsible for 11 percent of freshwater consumed in industrial nations, according to a 2007 report from the environmental paper network. Which is greener, paper books or ebooks, paper magazines and newspapers or their digital counterparts. Should i stop buying paper books and use an ereader instead. Are ipads and kindles better for the environment than books. Study paints kindle ereader a dark shade of green cnet. Based on a research survey, we analyze whether students prefer ebooks or print. The fact that its illegal in 50 states and the district of columbia to toss your ereader into the trash it contains hazardous wastea lithium polymer battery ought to tell us something. Making an applestoapples comparison of the environmental impact of paper versus digital media is difficult, if not impossible. A digital book, magazine, or newspaper is an intangible virtual item. The waste of energy, water and paper caused by pulping so many books must be considerable by comparison if a genuine comparison is even possible. So if you care about the environmental impact of your reading medium, remember that it is not a binary question of book vs ebook.
For the purposes of our study, an ebook is defined. Ive just bought a kindle ereader and, looking at all my shelves of books at home, am left wondering which has the smaller environmental footprint paper books or ebooks f wilson, by email. Yes, electronic books are more ecofriendly than traditional, paper books, because electronic books can easily be recycled. Are reading ebooks on ereaders environmentally friendly. Measures of ereaders environmental impacts also include the. The environmental impact of growing numbers of ebooks in. Yet, the negative environmental impact of print books really stems from the rate at which one reads their print books. Earth day is this saturday and many people will likely be reading a new ebook on their kindle to promote reduced emissions. There are also advantages to reading print that transcend any lifecycle analysis longevity, tactile. Along that logic, reading over 44 books on an ereader would actually halve a persons impact on the climate. Life cycle analysis institute of the environment and.
The goal of this life cycle analysis is to compare the production of an ereader with the production of paper books to see which product is more environmentally sustainable. Jan 05, 20 should i stop buying paper books and use an ereader instead. Check out this list of publishing vendors who take the environment into account. Effects of the ereader on the environment home guides.
A new question has surfaced as to how much of this money should be invested in paper books versus ebooks. Apr 07, 2016 this is a video promoting the free online course reading literature in the digital age, a free online course by university of basel available on futurelear. Paper books are easier on the eyes since theres no eye strain that comes with an electronic device or ereader. There are unlimited downloads, all without ever killing a tree. Kindle is always the first choice among users who prefer ebooks over books. In terms of the effect on the climate, the emissions created by a sin.
According to one lifecycle analysis of printed books versus ereaders, the energy, water, and raw materials needed to make a single ereader is equal to that of 40 to 50 books. In todays article, well look into the pros and cons of the new ebooks. Sep 01, 2009 study paints kindle ereader a dark shade of green. The results indicate that there are impact categories and circumstances where paper books are preferable to ebooks from an environmental perspective and vice versa. The environmental impact of transitioning away from paper books towards electronic readings is not well understood and so developing information on the subject will be useful to boston college s libraries as they continue to add to their scholarly literature collections for student researching purposes. Stephen lowman makes an important contribution to the ongoing dialogue about the impact of ebooks vs. Acidification, with only one user per book, the kindle may have less environmental impact. What has a more negative impact on the environment. Jun 20, 2014 choosing books to take on holiday has got more difficult in recent years. Should i stop buying paper books and use an ereader. Producing one book consumes two kilowatt hours of fossil fuels and approximately 7. Either the ink get fades away or the paper starts degrading. Choosing books to take on holiday has got more difficult in recent years.
The lowest longterm environmental impact remains sharing paper books, buying second. The environmental impact executive of amazons kindle. The fact that its illegal in 50 states and the district of columbia to toss your ereader into the trash it contains hazardous wastea. According to one lifecycle analyses of printed books versus ereaders, the energy, water, and raw materials needed to make a single ereader is equal to that of 40to50 books. Environmental justice encompasses the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, class or colour with respect to the development, implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations and policies that could negatively impact their lifestyles. A good majority of you think theres a time and place for both ebooks and paper books. The comparison will be for generic industry data for both technologies and a. I just love paper books, the smell, the weight, the paper, the covers, the appendices, the. Yes, tabletereaders require a certain amount of resources, however this cannot compare to traditional paper books. Many booklovers still prefer the traditional option and value the tactile sensation of a bound paper book. Whether youre team ereader or team book, its pretty.
This study showed that, in addition to the paper used, the way books are bought and distributed, including possible personal transportation, can significantly affect the total environmental impact of paper books. In terms of the effect on the climate, the emissions created by a single ereader are equal to roughly 100 books. Does a multiuse gadget such as the ipad increase the environmental credentials of the ebook because it means this single piece. Jul 27, 2012 are ereaders or books better for the environment. As the number of users per book increased, the data suggested that the printed book tends to have less of an environmental impact. Papers book the ereader and paper book are becoming hot topic for many reasons today. Weve already taken several glances at where ebooks stand out so well aim for a different approach today. Ebooks are better for the environment because they save on paper, however with paper books, you will not have to worry about your reader getting dropped, malfunctioning or breaking down. Well see how they stack up compared to traditional books. Producing a book from recycled paper uses about 23 of a pound of. Many booklovers still prefer the traditional option and value the tactile sensation of a. The largest environmental impact an ereader has is in the production of the device itself. The results indicate that there are impact categories and circumstances where paper books are preferable to e books from an environmental perspective and vice versa.
Now it is a question not just of what to read but how on paper, tablet, ereader, or perhaps even a phone and. Gpi also calculated that books and newspapers produce 153 billion gallons of wastewater annually. Pulp mills contribute to air, water and land pollution. Paper versus digital media environmental impact green. But that doesnt mean books go easy on the environment. Though these are valid questions, hopefully some background information will lead to a greater appreciation of this issues importance. Dont be misled about paper versus electronic books.
There is little energy used compared to chopping down a tree. Print adeel khalid1 abstract electronic books or ebooks are becoming more and more common in colleges. The printed book is a significant waste of energy, water and paper. Printed book an environmental analysis rit scholar. If measures such as eco publishing are taken, their environmental impact decreases substantially. Kindle electronic book readers impact on the environment suggests. The site has a great selection of articles about the environmental impact of book printing. You cant print a book without killing some trees, and an alarming 30 million trees give their lives to the pulp and paper industry each year see reference 1.
There are pros to both ebooks and traditional books. Presumably, all the ebooks of freedom can be easily updated online, much like a software update. One of the best sites about ebooks and the environment is ecolibris. Book lovers are opting for both so lets see the pros and cons of each. A new study analyzing the amazon kindle electronic book readers impact on the environment suggests that, on average, the carbon emitted over the life of the device is offset after the first year of use. An ebook can last for almost a century but maintaining a book for even 25 years is a very difficult task. Environmentalists have looked at the environmental implications associated with producing, storing, shipping paper books. As the biggest industrial water user, the publishing industry is responsible for 11 percent of freshwater consumed in industrial nations, according to a. An analysis by the cleantech group finds, when used to replace paper, amazons kindle is. The impact per book read can be significantly decreased by sharing books with others. Ebooks, one of the newest electronic sources are becoming more and more talked about in debates dealing with readings. Its not just buying ebooks that matters, said the reports author, emma ritch, of san franciscobased cleantech group.
Well, one of the aims of the ebook is that you just have to buy one to have access to thousands of books. Sustainablog has a good summation of printed books environmental impact. So if by a paper book or an ebook you mean one book an one ebook, the ebook is definitely worst, but over time, if you read regularly, th. Producing a book from recycled paper uses about 23 of a pound of minerals and two gallons of water. Sure, producing one kindle is tougher on the environment than printing a single copy of pride and prejudice. This is a video promoting the free online course reading literature in the digital age, a free online course by university of basel available on futurelear. Ecolibris is following the discussion and providing you with links to articles, reports and other sources of information that address this issue. The fact that its illegal in 50 states and the district of columbia to toss your ereader into the trash it contains hazardous wastea lithium polymer battery. This is a never ending debate, but honestly, its all about the content and not the appearance. Are electronic books for ecofriendly than traditional, paper. Apr 22, 2010 stephen lowman makes an important contribution to the ongoing dialogue about the impact of e books vs.
764 787 245 1085 229 404 475 1507 75 576 1261 704 671 1258 928 263 1419 2 672 1069 1213 901 115 1256 877 1474 773 246 81 1006 529 368 1369 309 1125 629 645 939 737 990 1035 769 150 1282 848